|
North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: real-time DDoS help?
Well if people use this IRC server, there's definately going to be more control over the channel and server itself. And if needed, other members could gain more control server-wide. Let me know if you have any questions. On Mon, Jun 21, 2004 at 11:06:32PM -0700, andrew matthews wrote: > > i thought there was nanog @efnet with a lot of these people on it... > i'm sure there are plenty of chat networks out tehre without having to > start a new one. > > On Sun, 20 Jun 2004 22:47:52 -0500, Bubba Parker > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > My IRC server is at irc.citynetwireless.net. It runs dancer-ircd 1.0.35 > > along with its own services (Nick/ChanServ/etc) and stays up as long as > > my DS3 does :). > > > > On Sun, Jun 20, 2004 at 08:29:40PM -0700, [email protected] wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Hey, > > > > > > > > > Let me know if the IRC server has been setup... > > > I do know there is already a #nanog channel on EFNet.. > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > Ken > > > Network Engineer > > > CalPOP.com, Inc. > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of > > > Bubba Parker > > > Sent: Saturday, June 19, 2004 9:01 PM > > > To: [email protected] > > > Subject: Re: real-time DDoS help? > > > > > > I could host and/or setup the irc server if anyone is interested. > > > > > > On Sun, Jun 20, 2004 at 03:23:06AM +0000, Christopher L. Morrow wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, 19 Jun 2004, Charles Sprickman wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, 20 Jun 2004, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, 19 Jun 2004, Jonathan Slivko wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Maybe if NANOG had irc.nanog.org, maybe that might be something > > > to > > > > > > > consider - a real-time network of communication for network > > > operators > > > > > > > to deal with issues, etc. > > > > > > > > > > > > There's always > > > http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/nsp-security > > > > > > > > > > I can tell you right off AS8059 doesn't meet the requirements. I'd > > > gladly > > > > > respond to any reports of attacks from them, but I don't think you'd > > > ever > > > > > see any. > > > > > > > > which of your 2 upstreams isn't helping out? I'm fairly certain both > > > > providers have security groups, and do mitigate attacks for customers > > > on a > > > > regular basis. Perhaps you are not getting in touch with the correct > > > > customer service folks? We often have this issue ;( > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Basement multihomers unite. > > > > > > > > > > > > > hurray! > > > > > > -- > > > Bubba Parker > > > [email protected] > > > CityNet LLC > > > http://www.citynetinfo.com/ > > > > > > > -- > > Bubba Parker > > [email protected] > > CityNet LLC > > http://www.citynetinfo.com/ > > > > > > > > noname - 1K > > -- Bubba Parker [email protected] CityNet LLC http://www.citynetinfo.com/
|