North American Network Operators Group
Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

Re: Cisco HFR

  • From: Petri Helenius
  • Date: Thu May 27 04:22:44 2004 
Tony Li wrote:


I've heard the rumor that that would be the first port that they would
undertake, and that would make some sense.  However, I hope that they
focus their efforts on stabilizing first and porting second.  No point
in porting what isn't stable.
I thought the main reason for "in service upgrades" was to allow daily updates to the code instead of the now popular bi-weekly ones. :-)

Pete