|
North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: Spam handling
Joe, > Nice, why bother advertising such a removal via email? Because everyone is really meant to also own a Hotmail, AOL, Yahoo, gmail, or some such "reputable" email service that you use for instances like this. OR... set your outbound SMTP server to your upstream's so that at least this message goes out correctly. In your case (for 24.61.68.177) you would use Comcast's SMTP name, whatever that is. Martin --- At 08:31 PM 4/28/2004, joe wrote: >Ok so I send an email to a friend at SBC. Here's the result. > >The original message was received at Wed, 28 Apr 2004 23:23:51 -0400 >from pc2.rocknyou.com [192.168.1.28] > > ----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors ----- ><[email protected]> > (reason: 553 5.3.0 DNSBL:To request removal of,[xx.xx.xxx.111],send an >E-mail to [email protected]) > > ----- Transcript of session follows ----- >... while talking to mx1-klmzmi.klmzmi.ameritech.net.: >>>> MAIL From:<[email protected]> ><<< 553 5.3.0 DNSBL:To request removal of,[xxx.xxx.xx.177],send an E-mail to >[email protected] >501 5.6.0 Data format error > >Ok, I send an email to to [email protected] >result: > >The original message was received at Wed, 28 Apr 2004 23:24:09 -0400 >from pc2.rocknyou.com [192.168.1.28] > > ----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors ----- ><[email protected]> > (reason: 550 5.0.0 Access denied) > > ----- Transcript of session follows ----- >... while talking to mx.dia.sbcglobal.net.: >>>> MAIL From:<[email protected]> ><<< 550 5.0.0 Access denied >554 5.0.0 Service unavailable > >Nice, why bother advertising such a removal via email? > >Cheers >-Joe
|