North American Network Operators Group

Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

RE: Cisco Router best for full BGP on a sub 5K bidget 7500 7200 or other vendor ?

  • From: Alexander Hagen
  • Date: Sun Apr 25 06:53:44 2004

I bought a Riverstone Rs-3000 for BGP with a single upstream provider.
Great Deal.  

Now I am back to the Cisco Question.

I have two options within my budget:

1) Catalyst 6006 w/ CATALYST 6000 SUPERVISOR ENGINE 1-A, 2GE, PLUS MSFC
& PFC 
2) CATALYST WS-X6248-RJ45, 48-PORT 10/100 FAST ETHERNET SWITCHING MODULE
3) DRAM UPGRADE to 256 on Supe Card.

This system costs somewhere around 1300.00 more than a:
 Cisco 7505 w RSP4 256 Plus (2) VIP 2-50/128 and 3 PA-FE-TX

Obviously the Catalyst is a better unit. But will it be as "burned in"
and robust as the venerable 7505 ? 

I need to order by Monday A.M. as the router we have now - a 4840G is an
extremely weird beast. 

Thanks

Alexander Hagen
Etheric Networks Incorporated, A California Corporation
 
-----Original Message-----
From: Robert E. Seastrom [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Monday, February 09, 2004 4:59 PM
To: Tom (UnitedLayer)
Cc: Alexander Hagen; [email protected]
Subject: Re: Cisco Router best for full BGP on a sub 5K bidget 7500 7200
or other vendor ?


"Tom (UnitedLayer)" <[email protected]> writes:

> On Sun, 8 Feb 2004, Alexander Hagen wrote:
> > The PA-2FE-TX is about 1600.00- better to get a second PA-FE-TX with
> > second VIP2-50
> >
> > Now why is the CX-FEIP-2TX so much cheaper than the PA-2FE-TX ?????
> 
> I believe because the CX-FEIP-2TX is a full length card.
> The PA-2FE-TX also isn't able to handle a full 100Mbps per port, so
don't
> be suprised if it doesn't work well :)
> 
> VIP2/50 is a much better combo.

The reason that the CX-FEIP-2TX is so inexpensive is that it is
interesting mainly as a curiousity of transitional technology.

A CX-FEIP-2TX is VIP1, not a VIP2 (even a 2-15 or 2-20), and is
incapable of being upgraded to do distributed anything, (cef, flow,
whatever).  It barely does full-duplex at line rate on one port, let
alone two.

Its sole use, if you happen to like to keep old hardware around, is
that it will work in a 7000/7010 with RP/[S]SP, (ie, not an RSP).  You
can use them in a 7500 (or a 7000 with an RSP7k), but why would you
want to?

                                        ---Rob