North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: why use IPv6, was: Lazy network operators
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 >> Perhaps ipv6 has some dark spots that may have made upgrading not >> attractive >> at this time, but stopping work on it and continuing ipv4 for next 100 >> years >> is not an option in my view - we just need to put more effort on >> things >> like multihoming support for ipv6 (and its not an unsolvable problem, >> the >> cell phone companies are somehow able to deal with greatly increasing >> number >> of phones and use of cell phones and roaming works quite well, for me >> almost everywhere at least). > > No, it's not an unsolvable problem. The multi6 WG will in a few weeks > have a architectural analysis draft published, going through the > various proposals that have been made (and they are a lot). The > discussion that is due to follow will need all input it can get. I do > encourage people to subscribe to the mailinglist and join that > discussion! As was pointed out to me, I forgot to say how to subscribe : http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/multi6-charter.html - - kurtis - -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP 8.0.3 iQA/AwUBQIYY96arNKXTPFCVEQL6QACfURBnmYcuW3AKkK9iZv5cKGGpg8wAn2r9 iqUyPzs6GC7qwj/TDr8Ku7E0 =3n0f -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
|