|
North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: why use IPv6, was: Lazy network operators
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 As co-chair of the multi6 WG : On 2004-04-19, at 02.29, william(at)elan.net wrote: > Perhaps ipv6 has some dark spots that may have made upgrading not > attractive > at this time, but stopping work on it and continuing ipv4 for next 100 > years > is not an option in my view - we just need to put more effort on things > like multihoming support for ipv6 (and its not an unsolvable problem, > the > cell phone companies are somehow able to deal with greatly increasing > number > of phones and use of cell phones and roaming works quite well, for me > almost everywhere at least). No, it's not an unsolvable problem. The multi6 WG will in a few weeks have a architectural analysis draft published, going through the various proposals that have been made (and they are a lot). The discussion that is due to follow will need all input it can get. I do encourage people to subscribe to the mailinglist and join that discussion! Best regards, - - kurtis - -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP 8.0.3 iQA/AwUBQIWIs6arNKXTPFCVEQLU/wCdFxVLrTswwUL5GQgei+sfuYTJPfwAoNzw o1GimcbzYp72ngq16PI44Jws =+GuV -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
|