North American Network Operators Group
Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

Re: SORBS Insanity

  • From: Matthew Sullivan
  • Date: Thu Apr 15 09:22:13 2004 
Jeremy Kister wrote:


I became aware that just about all of 64.115.0.0/16

In this same email, I also stated:
1.  exactly which 64.115 networks were dynamic
Ok now I have settled into another night of fixing things... I see no mails from yourself in the ticketting system which indicate dynamic ranges - all seem to just demand delisting of all the blocking the /16 statin gthey are all static.... (I have not looked at tickets owned by the other SORBS staff)

In your mail you indicated some of the rDNS is clear in that it indicates what address ranges are dynamic, and you also say above you have stated them - so I have removed the /16, now lets see a little help and give us this list, and I will then be able to list them.... otherwise I will have to go back to analysing the rDNS dump and guessing which are which again.

Yours

Mat