North American Network Operators Group

Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

Re: Lazy network operators

  • From: Miquel van Smoorenburg
  • Date: Wed Apr 14 04:11:49 2004
  • Distribution: cistron
  • Newsgroups: lists.nanog

In article <[email protected]>,
Petri Helenius  <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>Paul Vixie wrote:
>
>>that's somewhat the opposite of empowerment.  if a "spam solution" can
>>take away that crisis and the expense is that my dsl-connected end host
>>has to tunnel its e-mail to someplace out in <www.vix.com/personalcolo>
>>then that's a tradeoff i can live with.
>>  
>>
>>
>You, sure, how about the people who are not really computer literate and 
>use SMTP AUTH to send their mail from various places? Remember that 
>convinience almost always outweighs security with the general 
>population. If it wouldnŽt, the ICT market would not look like it looks 
>today.

That was solved 6 years ago. You let them use port 587 instead of 25.
http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2476.html

Mike.