North American Network Operators Group

Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

RE: worm information

  • From: Christopher J. Wolff
  • Date: Sat Apr 10 14:52:03 2004

Ravi,

One of the responses to this thread mentioned a 3COM switch.  One of the
infected sites has a 3COM superstack 1100.  I'm not a 3COM fan but these
switches have been up for years, literally.  All it takes to make this
switch reboot is a flow from one infected host.  I'm going to try to move
the web interface port away from 80.  Thank you.

Regards,
Christopher J. Wolff, VP CIO
Broadband Laboratories, Inc.
http://www.bblabs.com

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
> ravi pina
> Sent: Saturday, April 10, 2004 11:44 AM
> To: Christopher J. Wolff
> Cc: [email protected]; 'Darrell Greenwood'; 'nanog list'
> Subject: Re: worm information
> 
> 
> hmm, honestly i can't vouch for the data rate personally.
> a co-worker said the counters on the VPN connections were
> grossly disproportionate for a short time sample.
> 
> bottom line, it is indeed annoying.  i know my server
> and desktop groups have been having a hell of a time
> disinfecting hosts.  i know part of this was that
> symantec, at the time, said it may be a polymorphic
> strain.
> 
> -r