North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical RE: Spam with no purpose?
>> Michel Py wrote: >> Indeed; notice I did write "Bayesian-like" and not "Bayesian" and >> never mentioned anything about good ones or not-as-good ones. > Paul Jakma wrote: > Right, but if we're going to talk about bayesian filtering > in general, there's little sense in constraining the > discussion to "not-as-good" bayesian filters. The not-as-good > filters are obviously doomed to extinction, if they do not > improve and become good ones. Paul, I hope you forgive my bluntness, but this is the worst argument you have ever made in the hundreds of postings I had the privilege to exchange with you on other mailing lists over the years. Especially on _this_ mailing list, if you were right, Microsoft would be extinct. Michel.
|