North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: 2001:590::/32 announced by both AS4436 (nLayer) and AS4474 (Global Village, no contact in whois, but seems to be nLayer...)
so... the subject is somewhat disingenious. there is no problem with a prefix being announced by more than one ASN. Per the original subject, this seemed to be your gripe. however, the thread has devolved into someone using network resources w/o registration... which is different. > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > [cc: to [email protected], maybe now it will get their > attention instead of going into /dev/null] > > Hi, > > Here is some operational content, instead of Packet Kiddies > trying to rape each other verbally ;) > > According to Toshikazu Saito (Powerdcom): > > > I know both ASs, 4436 and 4474 are yours, so > > nlayer should resolve this problem or respond to this. > > But: > > OrgName: Global Village Communication, Inc. > OrgID: GVC-8 > Address: 1144 East Arques Avenue > City: Sunnyvale > StateProv: CA > PostalCode: 94086 > Country: US > > ASNumber: 4474 > ASName: GVIL1 > ASHandle: AS4474 > Comment: The information for this ASN has been reported to > Comment: be invalid. ARIN has attempted to obtain updated data, but has > Comment: been unsuccessful. To provide current contact information, > Comment: please e-mail [email protected] > RegDate: 1995-03-08 > Updated: 2003-07-31 > > The reason for the above was that we are currently seeing > 2001:590::/32 announced by both AS4436 (nLayer) and AS4474 > (Global Village Communication) but apparently this is the > same company and apparently they are using the bogus ASN. > Bogus as it has no valid contact information > > See telnet://grh.sixxs.net > or http://www.sixxs.net/tools/grh/lg/?find=2001:590::/32 > for the odd routes and who it goes over. > > As nLayer seems to be able to only send ticket responses > but there seems to be no real user alive maybe it is time > to start letting their peers ask them what to do with this > and if they can't contact them to just start depeering? > Unresponsive "NOC"'s is a real nightmare. > > Greets, > Jeroen > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: Unfix PGP for Outlook > Comment: Jeroen Massar / http://unfix.org/~jeroen/ > > iQBGBAERAgAQCRApqihSMz58IwUCQFb4WAAAoTsAniiZQnM0LhXbVJD7keZCNu6f > CM2OAKCPs2tdOfwt49m8/xLnugqyGRMnGA== > =ePKi > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >
|