North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical
Re: IPv6 reverse lookup - lame delegation?
> > > On Wed, 11 Feb 2004, Paul Vixie wrote: > > : as a practical matter, it is impossible to ensure that all name servers > : and resolvers understand DNAME. but it is very possible to ensure that > : a given zone, such as "8.f.126.96.36.199.0.2.ip6.arpa" in ISC's case, is only > : served by authority servers who understand DNAME and do CNAME synthesis. > > Would it be too much to try to get the RIRs to agree that "ip6.int." get a > DNAME and all other zones get unlinked in a shorter timeframe? i.e. why go > through the motions of many different subzones of ip6.int. having DNAMEs > when just one record will do for the world? > > In any other Internet context, I can see this as being too many cooks in the > kitchen, but the entities serving up ip6.int. zones are of a reasonably > small number. > > -- Todd Vierling <[email protected]> <[email protected]> -IF- (its a big one) we can get the IANA to agree, then the DNAME haq would be implemented post haste. --bill