North American Network Operators Group

Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

Re: Any 1U - 2U Ethernet switches that can handle 4K VLANs?

  • From: Mikael Abrahamsson
  • Date: Mon Jan 26 02:04:42 2004

On Sun, 25 Jan 2004, Alexei Roudnev wrote:

> Of course, if they want L3 routing on every box (I do not like such idea,
> but it's possible), then 3550 (or what do they have now?) is the best
> choice.

Definately not. The 3550 is an overpriced outdated product with moderate 
performance with way too small table sizes. For instance:

The Summit48si handles 128k MAC addresses. The 3550 handles something like 
6-15k. 

The Summit48si can do buffering when doing QoS/shaping, the 3550 does only
policing. If you want to deliver a 2meg service over ethernet to a
customer, this is a big issue.

There is only one product in the 3550 line that is pricewise worth getting
is the 3550-12G if you need to do L2 gig aggregation to 1gig uplink and
you do not have many VLANs.

There are three issues I see where the 3550 actually has a selling point:

VRFs (even though they are too few)
Q-in-Q (limited by the small mac table size)
CEF (if you have very small routing table size and no broadcasts)

-- 
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: [email protected]