|
North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: /24s run amuck
And then there are the upstreams that filter legacy /24's Seen that too... ----- Original Message ----- From: "Patrick W.Gilmore" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Cc: "Patrick Gilmore" <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2004 15:13 Subject: Re: /24s run amuck > > On Jan 13, 2004, at 4:04 PM, Vadim Antonov wrote: > > > > On Tue, 13 Jan 2004, Michael Hallgren wrote: > >>> > >>> On Jan 13, 2004, at 6:33 AM, Michael Hallgren wrote: > >>> > >>> Unfortunately, I've seen Peering Policies which require > >>> things like "Must announce a minimum of 5,000 prefixes". :( > >> > >> > >> Wonderful... > >> > >> mh > > > > Easy to fix by changing to "covering N million IP addresses" - but, > > then, > > that becomes an address space conservation issue. > > Yeah, that makes sense 'cause the utility of my network is directly > related to the number of IPs in it. > > Er, um, uh.... Maybe not. > > -- > TTFN, > patrick > > >
|