North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical
I answered questions posed here on related inet-access mail list thread and there is also info there on my previous post why the accusations had had basis for it. Those who are interested may read it there or in archives and Susan will I'm sure welcome me not taking any more of nanog resource on this. Again if somebody has ->particular<- data to indicate that website is not accurate, please feel free to contact me in private or on appropriate mail list, otherwise lets stop from continuing on nanog as it only invites more trolling. > On Wed, 10 Dec 2003 [email protected] wrote: > > P.S. Note to other - this thread may have happened because of recent > > thread on layer42 on inet-access mail list. While I generally answer > > accusations, I'm not the one who starts such threads and do not think its > > approriate for nanog mail list, so this will be my only message here. > > I think you've made plenty of accusations without basis, so to quote > Richard Cox "Then you would appear to have a circular argument to contend > with." > > Don't go around accusing people of malfeasance if you're not prepared to > be confronted with your own wrongdoing (IE your own hijacked blocks), or > to face the criticism of others when you're wrong. > > I generally try to stay out of these types of arguements, but I think that > you should probably focus your efforts on something more productive than > defaming other ISPs.