|
North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: The Cidr Report
On Fri, 14 Nov 2003, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote: > Stephen J. Wilcox writes on 11/14/2003 7:16 AM: > > > So anyway, was discussing the cidr report at the last nanog.. I was pointing out > > that deaggregation is discouraged by the naming and shaming and then someone > > else pointed out that this list has scarcely altered in months. > > > > So, what can we do as the operator community if this report isnt having the > > desired effect? > > Stop accepting /24 type routes? Yeah maybe but what about where the RIRs have assigned independent /24 space.. or ISPs have subdelegated the IPs to a multihomed customer, was more thinking about where a bunch of routes originating from a single ASN can be aggregated rather than routing bloat in general. There are numerous such examples of people with eg a /19 announcing 32x /24 etc Steve
|