North American Network Operators Group

Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

Re: Cost of Worm Attack Protection

  • From: Jamie Reid
  • Date: Thu Nov 13 17:34:44 2003

While I can't give you a fixed cost, I can confidently say that the value or cost/benefit over time resembled 
a bathtub curve. It starts high, drops sharply close to zero, then climbs slowly over time as the infection 
rate dissipates while a fixed mitigation strategy is applied, with diminishing results. 

For blaster/nachi, we are starting to encounter side effects of the filters put in place, which is slowly
incurring support costs as exceptions are made.  



--
Jamie.Reid, CISSP, [email protected]
Senior Security Specialist, Information Protection Centre 
Corporate Security, MBS  
416 327 2324 
>>> <[email protected]> 11/13/03 09:35am >>>


I was hoping to get some estimates from folks on the costs of defending networks from various worm attacks.  It is a pretty wide open question, but if anyone has some rough estimates of what it costs per edge, manpower vs. equipment costs, or any combination thereof it would be of great assistance.  We are doing some simulations of attack and defense strategies and looking for some good metrics to plug into a cost benefit model.  We'd be happy to share the results if anyone is interested as well.

Thanks in advance,

sean
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=windows-1252">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1226" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY style="MARGIN-TOP: 2px; FONT: 8pt Tahoma; MARGIN-LEFT: 2px">
<DIV><FONT size=1></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=1>While I can't give you a fixed cost, I can confidently say 
that the&nbsp;value&nbsp;or cost/benefit&nbsp;over time resembled </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=1>a bathtub curve. </FONT><FONT size=1>It starts 
high,&nbsp;drops sharply close to zero, then climbs slowly over time as the 
infection </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=1>rate dissipates </FONT><FONT size=1>while&nbsp;a fixed 
mitigation strategy&nbsp;is applied, with diminishing results. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=1></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=1>For blaster/nachi, we are starting to encounter side effects 
of the filters put in place, which is slowly</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=1>incurring support costs as exceptions are made.&nbsp; 
</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><BR>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>--<BR>Jamie.Reid, CISSP, <A 
href="mailto:[email protected]";>[email protected]</A><BR>Senior 
Security Specialist, Information Protection Centre <BR>Corporate Security, 
MBS&nbsp; <BR>416 327 2324 <BR>&gt;&gt;&gt; &lt;[email protected]&gt; 11/13/03 
09:35am &gt;&gt;&gt;<BR><BR><BR>I was hoping to get some estimates from folks on 
the costs of defending networks from various worm attacks.&nbsp; It is a pretty 
wide open question, but if anyone has some rough estimates of what it costs per 
edge, manpower vs. equipment costs, or any combination thereof it would be of 
great assistance.&nbsp; We are doing some simulations of attack and defense 
strategies and looking for some good metrics to plug into a cost benefit 
model.&nbsp; We'd be happy to share the results if anyone is interested as 
well.<BR><BR>Thanks in advance,<BR><BR>sean<BR><BR></DIV></BODY></HTML>