North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: Heads-up: AT&T apparently going to whitelist-only inbound mail
I'm getting nothing but timeouts at this point to any of att's mail servers. Nothing going through at all. -------------------------- Brian Bruns The Summit Open Source Development Group Open Solutions For A Closed World / Anti-Spam Resources http://www.sosdg.org ICQ: 8077511 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Marshall Eubanks" <[email protected]> To: "Mike Tancsa" <[email protected]> Cc: <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2003 5:57 PM Subject: Re: Heads-up: AT&T apparently going to whitelist-only inbound mail > > Here is my experience (names are changed to protect...) : > > Failed to deliver to '[email protected]' > SMTP module(domain att.com) reports: > message text rejected by ckmsi2.att.com: > 550 5.7.1 Your message was rejected as possible spam. Please call your > AT&T contact. [3] > > Failed to deliver to '[email protected]' > SMTP module(domain att.com) reports: > message text rejected by ckmsi2.att.com: > 550 5.7.1 Your message was rejected as possible spam. Please call your > AT&T contact. [3] > > Failed to deliver to '[email protected]' > SMTP module(domain att.com) reports: > message text rejected by ckmsi2.att.com: > 550 5.7.1 Your message was rejected as possible spam. Please call your > AT&T contact. [3] > > Failed to deliver to '[email protected]' > SMTP module(domain att.com) reports: > message text rejected by ckmsi2.att.com: > 550 5.7.1 Your message was rejected as possible spam. Please call your > AT&T contact. [3] > > Failed to deliver to '[email protected]' > SMTP module(domain att.com) reports: > message text rejected by ckmsi2.att.com: > 550 5.7.1 Your message was rejected as possible spam. Please call your > AT&T contact. [3] > > > > > On Tuesday, October 21, 2003, at 05:46 PM, Mike Tancsa wrote: > > > > > > > Wow, this sounds like a pretty extreme shotgun approach. (or is it > > April 1st somewhere). Is AT&T going to make this whitelist publicly > > available ? Perhaps if there was some global white list that everyone > > could consult against, it might be a little more useable. Still, what > > do you do about multi-stage relays ? > > > > ---Mike > > > >
|