North American Network Operators Group

Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

RE: Site Finder

  • From: Owen DeLong
  • Date: Thu Oct 16 15:30:15 2003




--On Thursday, October 16, 2003 12:57 -0600 Michael Loftis <[email protected]> wrote:

I have a good one, when was the last tiema  telco asked any of us, or
anyone for that matter, how to handle an NPA-NXX assignment?  or LERG?

This isn't necessarily a great analogy for this situation.  It is likely
Verisign thinks of themselves as the phone company in this case and us
as the consumers that don't know.

NEVER.  We're not qualified to make decisions like that because we don't
know what the effects could or would be.  Likewise VeriSign obviously
doesn't, nor do the general populace.  As many have suggested if VeriSign
wants to do this they can as a browser plugin or feature.

I don't think any phone company would ever consider routing all of the
invalid NPA-NXXs to an answering machine that plays recorded advertising
for the user.

I for one am going to dumping all traffic bound to SiteFinder.

Nah... Don't do that.  Dump all traffic coming FROM SiteFinder.  That way,
it ties up their resources, while still achieving the same effect.
(Wonder if I can figure out how to get a router to forward a packet and
still generate an admin-prohibited back to the source :-)

Owen

--On Thursday, October 16, 2003 9:38 AM -0700 Owen DeLong
<[email protected]> wrote:

They claim to be representing the "USER" community and to know better
than we what they end users want.  They think we're just a bunch of geek
engineers that are unwilling to embrace new ideas.  Most of all, they
think they can make money this way, and, they don't really care about
anything else. They're just trying to manipulate things so that the
backlash doesn't cause them too much difficulty as they inflict this on
the internet.

Owen