North American Network Operators Group

Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

RE: Extreme BlackDiamond

  • From: Shazad - eServers
  • Date: Mon Oct 13 13:15:39 2003

>>> From here, [email protected] looks like a relatively small colo 
>>> customer.    

Yes we are relatively small, we colocate around 1500 servers in our own
suite.

>>>> What's he looking at big switches for?
Quite frankly I can look for what I want, we are expanding into Europe and
came here for some advice.. Do we have any problems here?

>>> More importantly, does anyone care?
Does anybody care? Dammm GOOOD JOB that you are a small minority in this
world.


If you are so smart, GO and CHECK the HEADERS of that POST. Was it me? NO IT
WASENT.
You are too smart for yourself.

I am out of this... My last reply.

Best Regards, 
Shazad

 


-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
[email protected]
Sent: 13 October 2003 17:29
To: Richard A Steenbergen
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Extreme BlackDiamond


On Mon, 13 Oct 2003, Richard A Steenbergen wrote:

> Is it just me, or could nanog really benefit from being moderated, or at
> least nanog-post being access controlled? God knows why I've kept skimming
> it even after the majority of actual clueful network operators have long

Are you volunteering to be the moderator?  Moderation is alot of work, 
and/or would slow the list down to a crawl.

Perhaps limiting who can post would be somewhat useful though.  Perhaps 
only people actually operating "real networks", where "real networks" are 
somehow defined by their size or their participation in BGP.

>From here, [email protected] looks like a relatively small colo 
customer.  What's he looking at big switches for?  More importantly, does 
anyone care?

As long as I'm ranting, what about all the recent "could someone with clue
from Network X please contact me privately?" posts?  If I was that person
at Network X, I'd want to know what your issue was before I bothered
contacting you (very few of these posts have included any problem
description)...both so that I could look at the problem (if there was one)
before contacting you, so that I could have the appropriate person contact
you (if I'm not it), and so I could not waste the time if you're trying to
contact me about an issue (or non-issue) you have no business wasting my
time with.

network:Class-Name:network
network:ID:332.209.51.128.0/19
network:Auth-Area:209.51.128.0/19
network:Network-Name:eservers-00037-01
network:IP-Network:209.51.159.224/29
network:Organization;I:eServers dot biz
network:Tech-Contact;I:[email protected]
network:Admin-Contact;I:664.dv2.net
network:Created:20020906
network:Updated:20020906
network:Updated-By:[email protected]

----------------------------------------------------------------------
 Jon Lewis *[email protected]*|  I route
 Senior Network Engineer     |  therefore you are
 Atlantic Net                |  
_________ http://www.lewis.org/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key_________