|
North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical RoadRunner now bouncing the mail...
It seems RoadRunner is no longer deferring us or refusing our connections... they're BOUNCING everything. Nice. Oct 10 16:04:28 10.0.2.42 postfix/smtp[11683]: 778A77050E: to=<[email protected]>, relay=flmx04.mgw.rr.com[65.32.1.50], delay=5, status=bounced (host flmx04.mgw.rr.com[65.32.1.50] said: 550 5.7.1 Mail Refused - 216.220.40 - See http://security.rr.com/mail_blocks.htm#security - 20031009) Oct 10 16:04:32 10.0.2.43 postfix/smtp[17668]: 5413470CC9: to=<[email protected]>, relay=txmx02.mgw.rr.com[24.93.35.209], delay=373, status=bounced (host txmx02.mgw.rr.com[24.93.35.209] said: 550 5.7.1 Mail Refused - 216.220.40 - See http://security.rr.com/mail_blocks.htm#security - 20031009) Oct 10 16:04:43 10.0.2.43 postfix/smtp[16008]: F3B5270BD5: to=<[email protected]>, relay=ncmx02.mgw.rr.com[24.25.4.96], delay=437, status=bounced (host ncmx02.mgw.rr.com[24.25.4.96] said: 550 5.7.1 Mail Refused - 216.220.40 - See http://security.rr.com/mail_blocks.htm#security - 20031009) On Fri, 10 Oct 2003, Gerald wrote: > > On Fri, 10 Oct 2003, Ray Wong wrote: > > > RR has been using a lot of blocks for quite some time. Fortunately, they > > were very responsive when I mailed their abuse address as indicated on that > > URL. I gave them the allocation I was responsible for, asked for that > > subset of addresses to be unblocked, and things were fine within the day. > > Was simple, if somewhat annoying. > > Actually we just got blocked this morning by RR. Is something going on > there today? > > Gerald > -- Mark Jeftovic <[email protected]> Co-founder, easyDNS Technologies Inc. ph. +1-(416)-535-8672 ext 225 fx. +1-(416)-535-0237
|