North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical VeriSign list (was: sitefinder ...)
Mark Kosters wrote: > > In the interest in gaining more community review and comment, a discussion > list has been setup to discuss factually-based technical issues > and solutions surrounding the operational impact of wildcards in > top-level domains on Internet applications. > We already have such mailing lists. 1) for technical "specification of message formats, message handling, and data formats used for DNS client-server and server-server communication": http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/ A lively moderated discussion of wildcards is already underway. 2) for "[i]ssues surrounding the operation of DNS, recommendations concerning the configuration of DNS servers, and other issues with the use of the protocol": http://ops.ietf.org/lists/ops-area/ > VeriSign technical people will participate in discussions that are within > the scope for this mailing list. > VeriSign technical people should have participated elsewhere, and this mess might have been less likely to occur. I will not participate in a VeriSign sponsored list, as that might give fodder for another "press release" claiming network operators and designers had reviewed and approved the VeriSign changes. I recommend that others only join neutral unaffiliated discussion lists. -- William Allen Simpson Key fingerprint = 17 40 5E 67 15 6F 31 26 DD 0D B9 9B 6A 15 2C 32
|