North American Network Operators Group

Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

RE: If Verisign *really* wants to help ...

  • From: Michael Loftis
  • Date: Sat Sep 20 19:20:04 2003


I fairly certain the previous poster is talking not-in-service numbers, not busy numbers. Busy number redial is available here in the states, but most places you have to bang a *XX code when you get the busy signal, you don't tend to get any recording for it. Not in service numbers may get the LATA unable to connect or unable to route service depending on if the number you dialed was even in LERG. The system only does that in the even that it actually rang (and ringing in this sense doesn't mean you heard a ring generator on your end).

And yes, for the benefit of the others on NANOG, the process is more complicated than that, so lets not start another even further off-topic thread on the TDM/POTS system. And how it routes, or fails to route, calls.



--On Saturday, September 20, 2003 6:59 PM -0400 "Vivien M." <[email protected]> wrote:

Just out of curiosity, why did they discontinue it?

Here in Bell Canada land, this type of thing has been around for hm... 8
years or so? There was a big outcry the first week or so from dialup users
(at the time, busy signals were more common than now), then eventually
they all did the *XX code to permanently disable it. It is still enabled
on new [residential, at least] POTS lines.

Vivien
--
Vivien M.
[email protected]
Assistant System Administrator
Dynamic DNS Network Services
http://www.dyndns.org/


--
Undocumented Features quote of the moment...
"It's not the one bullet with your name on it that you
have to worry about; it's the twenty thousand-odd rounds
labeled `occupant.'"
  --Murphy's Laws of Combat