North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: Verisign changes violates RFC2821, and spam implications
On Wed, 17 Sep 2003, Stewart, William C (Bill), RTSLS wrote: > is there some conceivable case for which this system _would_ accept a message, > e.g. [email protected] ? There would be no reason for that particular machine(s) to receive legitimate email for itself, as Verisign can (and should) easily put an MX record pointing to another machine to handle legitimate mail directed @sitefinder-idn.verisign.com . Ergo, the hopefully more polite version of Snubby can cancel the SMTP transaction without having to check whether its mail directed to itself. --==-- Bruce.
|