|
North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical RE: Re: CalPOP contact? HTTP CONNECT scanning]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- [This message apparently was sent off list, but I think it is in everybodies interrest to know how the apparent owner/CEO/CTO whatever thinks about this, and possibly enlightening everybody where we do have to send abuse complaints.] lynn [mailto:[email protected]] wrote: > CalPOP has a vigorus anti-spam policy and > terminates any customers that are found to be spamming. > CalPOP has a ZERO TOLERANCE for spam and any abuse complaints should be sent to > [email protected] where they will be handled very quickly. 216.240.140.204 - - [03/Sep/2003:06:27:15 +0200] "CONNECT 65.54.253.99:25 HTTP/1.0" 200 2366 "-" "-" 216.240.140.204 - - [03/Sep/2003:06:27:17 +0200] "CONNECT 65.54.167.5:25 HTTP/1.0" 200 2366 "-" "-" 216.240.140.204 - - [03/Sep/2003:06:27:19 +0200] "CONNECT 65.54.253.230:25 HTTP/1.0" 200 2366 "-" "-" 216.240.140.204 - - [03/Sep/2003:06:27:20 +0200] "CONNECT 65.54.167.230:25 HTTP/1.0" 200 2366 "-" "-" 216.240.140.204 - - [03/Sep/2003:06:27:22 +0200] "CONNECT 65.54.254.151:25 HTTP/1.0" 200 2366 "-" "-" And see the beginning of the thread for more stuff and older dates. See: http://www.merit.edu/mailinglist/mailarchives/old_archive/msg13312.html Let's lookup those IP's in whois: 8<------------------------------------------ [email protected]:~$ date Sat Sep 6 12:23:47 CEST 2003 [email protected]:~$ whois 216.240.140.204 OrgName: WebVision/ATMLINK Inc. OrgID: ATML Address: 3250 Wilshire Blvd. Address: Suite 1405 City: Los Angeles StateProv: CA PostalCode: 90010 Country: US NetRange: 216.240.128.0 - 216.240.159.255 CIDR: 216.240.128.0/19 NetName: CALPOP-COMMUNICATIONS NetHandle: NET-216-240-128-0-1 Parent: NET-216-0-0-0-0 NetType: Direct Allocation NameServer: NS1.CALPOP.COM NameServer: NS2.CALPOP.COM Comment: CalPOP Communications RegDate: 1999-09-22 Updated: 2003-01-11 TechHandle: BSB-ARIN TechName: Bacsa, Sam Samuel TechPhone: +1-714-330-9227 TechEmail: [email protected] OrgAbuseHandle: CALPO-ARIN OrgAbuseName: CalPOP Abuse OrgAbusePhone: +1-213-351-1355 OrgAbuseEmail: [email protected] OrgNOCHandle: CNO4-ARIN OrgNOCName: CalPOP Network Operations OrgNOCPhone: +1-213-351-1355 OrgNOCEmail: [email protected] OrgTechHandle: BSB-ARIN OrgTechName: Bacsa, Sam Samuel OrgTechPhone: +1-714-330-9227 OrgTechEmail: [email protected]op.com # ARIN WHOIS database, last updated 2003-09-05 19:15 # Enter ? for additional hints on searching ARIN's WHOIS database. - --------------------------------->8 Let me see... [email protected] I don't see no [email protected] but I do see an [email protected] hmm so the "CEO" of this "company" doesn't even know where abuse is sent to? And they apparently don't handle abuse sent to the abuse address. > The idea that CalPOP is "knowingly facilitating this > behaviour" is simply not true. Then why don't you fix your customers and reply to abuse reports. Even having a ticket tracking system with an auto reply containing the wording that you are going to work at it and a pointer to your AUP, which you apparently don't have: http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&safe=off&q=AUP+site%3Acalpop.com http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&safe=off&q=Use+Policy+site%3Acalpop.com Turn up 0 records, oh and: http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&safe=off&q=abuse+site%3Acalpop.com http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&safe=off&q=spam+site%3Acalpop.com Don't return anything either. http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&safe=off&q=spam+calpop.com On the other hand show a LOT of spamming complaints. Thus dear "Lynn" go fix your network. Apparently you do want to do it as you did want to reply to the message, thus I sincerely hope you do so. > For the record, Patrick Greenwell never worked for CalPOP.com, Inc. - > although he did work for AirlineReservations.Com, Inc. for a VERY > short time when AirlineReservations.Com, Inc. owned CalPOP and was > under different management. Thus you worked for him, perfect :) > CalPOP has over 1,000 servers at it's Downtown Los Angeles > facility alone and is growing very fast and, of course, termination of > spammers is largely complaint driven- after all, there is such a thing as an > opt-in list - and there are various liability reasons and "common carrier" laws > which prevent CalPOP from prying into the servers of its customers to see > what they are doing . Good advertisement, thus you have 1000 spamming boxes? > CalPOP's Los Angeles data Center at Carrier Center 600 > W. 7th - a facility in which Patrick Greenwell has never been in so > obviously allot has changed. Why should he be going there if you just said that you can't pry into those servers anyways? > Patrick is a great and very knowledgable guy and I am > surprised to find him saying bad things about a network that he > was supposedly in charge of. Oh, so suddenly he DID manage it, quite odd that you say that he didn't just a few lines up. > Anyway, send any complaints, IF ANY, our way and we will handle them > accordingly. Fix your whois records, people all around the world don't even want to know about your operation in the spamming business. Also there is quite an apparent proof, see the other list managers that you really don't give a cents worth about anything related to being something in handling abuse and making you a good netizen. > Lynn Hoover > CalPOP.com, Inc. > 213-627-1937 > [email protected] Where can that address be found in whois again? > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Jeff S Wheeler" <[email protected]> > To: <[email protected]>; <[email protected]> > Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 7:31 PM > Subject: [Fwd: Re: CalPOP contact? HTTP CONNECT scanning] > > > > Dear Sirs: > > > > I thought you should read what is being said about your > organization on > > the NANOG (North American Network Operators Group) mailing > list by an > > individual who claims to have been in your employ. I > imagine you will > > have an enforcable NDA with said individual. Oh god NDA's... SUE SUE SUE SUE SUE!!!! We are in the US again :) <grin> Greets, Jeroen -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: Unfix PGP for Outlook Alpha 13 Int. Comment: Jeroen Massar / [email protected] / http://unfix.org/~jeroen/ iQA/AwUBP1m5kCmqKFIzPnwjEQIu1QCfYPls1CyfHxVV4tUwMPT7ON/BdeIAnA5i W+6/G/7Vp1eEE3SwTXIkMiBT =fPI5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |