North American Network Operators Group

Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

RE: dry pair

  • From: Austad, Jay
  • Date: Fri Aug 29 12:47:32 2003

I also tried asking for an Alarm Circuit.  I even explained to them what it
was, but they still didn't understand.  All of the people I talked to
wondered why in the world I would want a pair with no dialtone.  Too bad a I
can't just bribe a qwest tech with a few beers to patch it through for me.
:)

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ejay Hire [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Friday, August 29, 2003 11:22 AM
> To: Pendergrass, Greg; Austad, Jay; [email protected]
> Subject: RE: dry pair
> 
> 
> He's looking for two wires between two buildings with no switching
> equipment on them.  You'll have better luck if you ask for an "Alarm
> Pair", but everyone's nomenclature is different.
> 
> -Ejay
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pendergrass, Greg [mailto:[email protected]] 
> Sent: Friday, August 29, 2003 11:14 AM
> To: 'Austad, Jay'; [email protected]
> Subject: RE: dry pair
> 
> 
> Neither do we. Could you include some more details?
> 
> -Greg
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Austad, Jay [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: 29 August 2003 17:08
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: dry pair
> 
> 
> 
> Does anyone know to go about getting Qwest or a CLEC to patch 
> through a
> dry
> pair between two buildings connected to the same CO?
> 
> When I called to order one, no one knew what I was talking about.
> 
> -jay
> 
> 
> Vodafone Global Content Services Limited 
> Registered Office:  Vodafone House, The Connection, Newbury, Berkshire
> RG14 2FN
> 
> Registered in England No. 4064873 
> 
> This e-mail is for the addressee(s) only.  If you are not an 
> addressee,
> you
> must not distribute, disclose, copy, use or rely on this e-mail or its
> contents, and you must immediately notify the sender and delete this
> e-mail
> and all copies from your system.  Any unauthorised use may be 
> unlawful.
> The
> information contained in this e-mail is confidential and may also be
> legally
> privileged.
> 
> 
>