North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: Sobigf + BGP
On Wed, 27 Aug 2003 [email protected] wrote: > > We have seen that many people *posting* do not have the best of intentions; > > I can assure you that there are lurkers on Nanog (surprise, surprise) who > > are not nearly as naive and well-intentioned as J. O. would hope. In fact, > > I know that there are subscribers from various print media, various on-line > > media, and certainly some stunningly unpleasant characters that I run into > > on other lists. > > And after being /.ed several times, there are > undoubtedly end-users, small enterprises, non-network > folks from networking companies, and assorted other > groups which don't fit the traditional network operator > mold. Oh, and sales people... Case in point: http://slashdot.org/articles/03/08/27/0214238.shtml?tid=111&tid=126 references http://www.merit.edu/mailinglist/mailarchives/old_archive/msg12818.html For those few finding the NANOG archives for the first time with this /. link, I'm sure they'll take some time to poke around recent threads with interesting titles like "Sobigf + BGP" Pete.
|