North American Network Operators Group

Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

Re: Sobigf + BGP

  • From: Pete Kruckenberg
  • Date: Wed Aug 27 20:12:51 2003

On Wed, 27 Aug 2003 [email protected] wrote:

> > We have seen that many people *posting* do not have the best of intentions;
> > I can assure you that there are lurkers on Nanog (surprise, surprise) who
> > are not nearly as naive and well-intentioned as J. O. would hope. In fact,
> > I know that there are subscribers from various print media, various on-line
> > media, and certainly some stunningly unpleasant characters that I run into
> > on other lists.
> 
> And after being /.ed several times, there are
> undoubtedly end-users, small enterprises, non-network
> folks from networking companies, and assorted other
> groups which don't fit the traditional network operator
> mold. Oh, and sales people...

Case in point: 
http://slashdot.org/articles/03/08/27/0214238.shtml?tid=111&tid=126 
references http://www.merit.edu/mailinglist/mailarchives/old_archive/msg12818.html

For those few finding the NANOG archives for the first time
with this /. link, I'm sure they'll take some time to poke
around recent threads with interesting titles like 
"Sobigf + BGP"

Pete.