|
North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical RE: draft-savola-bcp38-multihoming-update-nn.txt
A quick run through show some section which are not correct and do not match some of the operational practice where BCP 38 is applied. I would offer to go off with Pekka and re-work some of these sections. The fact is that BCP 38 deployment is on the rise - including BCP 38 techniques with multihomed customers where traffic is asymmetrical. So this document needs to detail the techniques that are working, point out the misconceptions, and recommend a conservative deployment path for providers and customers. > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of > Fred Baker > Sent: Saturday, July 19, 2003 11:01 PM > To: [email protected] > Cc: Pekka Savola; Sue Joiner > Subject: draft-savola-bcp38-multihoming-update-nn.txt > > > Pekka and I have been discussing the impact of ingress filters on > multihomed networks - which may be ISPs or edge networks, and may have an > arbitrary number of upstream ISPs. > > We wonder what your thoughts might be regarding > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-savola-bcp38-multihoming-update- > 00.txt. > With your concurrence, we would like to recommend it for BCP status, as an > update to BCP 38. Our questions are at two levels: philosophical and at > the > detail level. If you have significant comments calling for a change of > text, it would help us if you proposed text.
|