North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical RE: Cisco vulnerability on smaller catalyst switches
>> I tested Catalyst 2924-XL-EN with 12.0(5)WC5a and I found that without >> L3 capability it does not seem to be affected. But with L3 >> connectivity, if you direct the attack at the VLAN1 interface it is >> definitely susceptible. > I believe directing the attack to VLAN1 should just kill the remote > management and won't effect switching capability. Can anyone confirm? Ah, you are right. I just tested it, and the switching through the catalyst continues without interruption. Only the management interface is unavailable. --steve |