|
North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical RE: possible exploit.. (Cisco Issue)
*raising hand* guilty of not reading past "Distribution" after version 1.0. Someone else pointed that out off list. Thanks, Gerald On Fri, 18 Jul 2003, Barry Raveendran Greene wrote: > > The changes are all detailed at the bottom of the advisory. > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of > > Gerald > > Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 8:43 AM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: possible exploit.. (Cisco Issue) > > > > > > Wouldn't it be nice if they would CVS-web this thing so I can just see the > > lines that they have changed on each revision. :-) > > > > ...off to read 1.5 > > > > G > > > > On Fri, 18 Jul 2003, NANOG wrote: > > > > > > > > It appears Cisco has seen the posting too. The Cisco PSIRT updated > > > their announcement to 1.4 at 5am this morning. The sentence in the > > > "Exploitation and Public Announcments" section is new and states that > > > they are aware that the exploitation "has been publised on a public > > > mailing list". > > > The link is the same, but the version number has changed: > > > http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/cisco-sa-20030717-blocked.shtml > > > > > > Len Rose wrote: > > > > > > >It seems to work. > > > > > > > >On Fri, Jul 18, 2003 at 02:39:18AM -0400, Len Rose wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>This was posted a while ago. > > > >> > > > >>http://lists.netsys.com/pipermail/full-disclosure/2003- > > July/011421.html > > > >>http://lists.netsys.com/pipermail/full-disclosure/2003- > > July/011420.html > > > >> > > > >>I haven't had the chance to test it in a controlled environment yet. > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
|