|
North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: IPv6
Thus spake "David Barak" <[email protected]> > --- Stephen Sprunk <[email protected]> wrote: > > Nearly every customer of mine has required IPv6 in > > their RFPs for over a > > year, but not a single one has turned it on even for > > testing. > > Right, but it means that more network providers are > having to offer some type of solution. This will > enable Windows (or whatever) to have it on by default > and actually have it work. We can hope. > Vendor C's issues with v6 are a problem, but they're > not the only provider of core or edge gear... > Also, even though their forwarding mechanisa are not > completely functional, they do pass packets, so it'll > work, just not be optimized. When a 30Mpps IPv4 box falls back to <200kpps for IPv6, I don't think "not completely functional" is an adequate description. To me, that falls into the "not supported" category. S
|