North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: Internet routes in Gobal Routing Table or in a VRF ?
The biggest benefit to using a VRF as I see it is that you will help prevent accidental redistribution of internet routes to VPN customers. Biggest downside: $VENDOR_C and $VENDOR_R SEs will tell you that their boxen will croak if you do it. Solution: $VENDOR_J does support it. -David Barak --- [email protected] wrote: > > Hello again, > Another question for BGP VPN experts. > If you provide Internet access and VPN service on > the same MPLS Core > network, > what are the pro and cons to transport in the core > the public internet > routes (the full 120.000 prefixes) > as VPN-V4 prefixes and announce them through a VRF > rather than as common > global routes ? > What are the trends in terms of security vs memory > vs stability ? > > Thanks in advance. > > > ===== David Barak -fully RFC 1925 compliant- __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Calendar - Free online calendar with sync to Outlook(TM). http://calendar.yahoo.com
|