|
North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical RE: About the address allocation convention between ISPs
Dear Mr. Maynard, Thank you very much! Sincerely Teng On Wed, 4 Jun 2003, Robert D. Maynard wrote: > Teng, > > See here for unnumbered interface information: > http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/701/20.html > > > > -Robert Maynard > Vice President of Network Operations > Alliance Information Systems, LLC > mailto:[email protected] > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of > Teng Fei > Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 6:11 AM > To: Darin Wayrynen > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: About the address allocation convention between ISPs > > > Dear Mr. Wayrynen, > > Thank you very much for your reply. What do you mean by "unnumbered > interfaces"? Also could you please confirm my question that if the > customer's address block was not obtained from the provider, it is also > a > convention that the provider will provider the /30 address for the > inter-domain link? > > >From the replys, it seems to me that there is no way to tell which > link is indeed the inter-domain link, if the two ASes are peers. But > for > customer-providers, I can guess with confidence. Could I get these > information from the IPSes' or PoP's website, about who are their > customers/peers? And how exactly the addresses were assigned? > > Sincerely > > Teng > > |