|
North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: IANA reserved Address Space
<snip blah> > Since all of the replies have been pretty close to the same (Use RFC1918 > ...etc), I'd like to rephrase it to answer a curiosity of mine. The answers seemed correct, rephrasing wont change current systems or policies to suit you! > RFC1918 is a set number of IP addresses. If you are working on a private > network lab Use anything you like, its private. > that will be on the internet eventually or have parts on the > internet and exceeds the total number of IPV4 addressing set aside in Follow the current policy for public Internet Address space, get what IPs you need, implement NAT where/if possible. > RFC1918, and IPV6 private addressing is not an option, what can you do? (I thats the way it is, take it or leave it.. Steve > know it's a stretch, but I think it asks specifically what Brennan wants > to know and what I'm curious about now) > > IPV6 would seem to be the best answer overall since it has already been > determined the solution for limited addressing, but there is still > equipment/software and such that does not support it. > > Brennan, is a mix of IPV6 and IPV4 private addressing an option for you? I > do have to agree wholeheartedly that using address space not assigned to > you is unprofessional, and will cause someone headaches later even if it > is not you. > > Gerald >
|