North American Network Operators Group

Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

Re: dnsbl's? - an informal survey

  • From: Jack Bates
  • Date: Fri May 30 22:27:44 2003

Mr. James W. Laferriere wrote:
<snip>

	White listing is NOT what was being discussed .  Tho is can be
	adventagous in the right circumstances .


<snip>
	And neither was Static addressing .  Filtering was being discussed
	based on some unknown (to me probably others as well) methodology .
		Twyl ,  JimL
White listing comes with any blacklist. The blacklists in particular being discussed were the @dynamics, like the PDL and dynablock at easynet. Both lists quite clearly state how they build their lists and what they are designed to block (dynablock only takes out dialup, and PDL takes out all dynamic addressing).

Given the number of insecure client systems on dynamic addressing (proxy servers, trojans, etc), accepting email from dynamic addresses is becoming inherently more dangerous. If smarthosts can't be used from those addresses, then special whitelisting can be done.

Of course, the person implementing email blocks of any type, especially public blacklists, must take some ammount of responsibility in maintaining legitimate email communications as dictated by users.


-Jack