North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: Market-based address allocation
[email protected] wrote: > On Thu, 01 May 2003 13:50:09 EDT, [email protected] said: > > > On Thu, 01 May 2003 12:37:22 CDT, Daniel Golding said: > > > > > bizaare. No management team would agree to it, because of the legal > > > exposure, large cash outlay required, and uncertain return on investment. > > > "Ok, Mr. CEO, give me $100M to corner the market on something that no one > > > has ever made money on before. Oh yeah, we'll be sitting on that cash for > > > a while, as we engage in activities likely to result in your future > > > incarceration. Sign here, please" > > > > Oh? You mean all the *other* management teams actually learned from Enron, > > Worldcom, Adelphia, and so on? > > OK. I'm fed up. What in the cited text triggered *THIS* one? Is somebody at > 'affidia.com' (source of this one) of the opinion that "management" is a > separate race that is being discriminated against? > > **************** eManager Notification ***************** > > The following mail was blocked since it contains sensitive content. > > Source mailbox: [email protected] > Destination mailbox(es): Daniel Golding;Jack Bates; [email protected] > Rule/Policy: Racial Discrimination > Action: Quarantine to C:\Program Files\Trend\SMCF\Quarantine\2003-05-01\10\54\DFImessagebody3eb15f502be9.tmp > > Sender, Your e-mail message has not been delivered to it's destination. It does npt comply with our acceptable use policy. > > ******************* End of message ********************* > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Part 1.2Type: application/pgp-signature I don't know, but according to the spambot, your name is 'Sender', and your message 'does npt comply !' Sysadmin fatfinger or smoking something, you be the judge. :) -- Andrea Abrahamsen Software Engineer, Intelligent Network Services Cisco Systems
|