North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: Re: Get as much IP space as you ever dreamed of, was: Re: Looking to buy IPv4 addresses from class C swamp
Stephen - ----- Original Message ----- From: "Stephen J. Wilcox" <[email protected]> To: "todd glassey" <[email protected]> Cc: "Stewart, William C (Bill), RTSLS" <[email protected]>; <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2003 5:43 AM Subject: Re: Re: Get as much IP space as you ever dreamed of, was: Re: Looking to buy IPv4 addresses from class C swamp > > On Tue, 27 May 2003, todd glassey wrote: > > > > > What I dont understand is the need to stay 1:1 routable. Most all of you > > larger ISP's could have your own private IP Space by simply running a NAT'd > > infrastructure. Why not do it for all your customers? > > And what if you want to host a webserver or mailserver? What about it? - You set common external-DNS on the customer facing side to refer that address to the tunnel manager and the TM then takes care of the packet's rewriting. Or did I miss something here? As to public publishing, create a virtual server on a set of the ISP's well known addresses and stack the servers up. What's the problem? > > Why stop there, what about with local exchanges in the PSTN, you could put all > towns on their own extension based PBX and save time in having to allocate phone > numbers.. Right! > > Steve > > > > > Todd > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Stewart, William C (Bill), RTSLS" <[email protected]> > > To: <[email protected]> > > Sent: Monday, April 28, 2003 11:27 PM > > Subject: RE: Re: Get as much IP space as you ever dreamed of, was: Re: > > Looking to buy IPv4 addresses from class C swamp > > > > > > > > [Let's try this again without fat-fingering the Send button :-)] > > > > Seems like an obvious case for using IPv6. > > RFC2373 site-local addresses assign a /48, > > with 16 bits of subnet ID and 64 bits of host ID. > > The average location probably doesn't have 2**16 extranets on one DMZ; > > picking a random value usually yields one that nobody you're talking to > > is also talking to, so almost nobody needs to use NAT for this kind of > > thing, > > assuming you plan to tunnel them. > > > > > |