North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: Missing registrations (when is a bogon not a bogon)
At 11:38 PM 29-04-03 -0400, Sean Donelan wrote: Based on the e-mail I got, I think several people missed Hank Nussbacher and Barry Greene's presentation at the last NANOG. We got a new volunteer, Terry Baranski to help out with the load. We just got Lucent to correct their announcements. They had been announcing:http://www.nanog.org/mtg-0302/ppt/hank.pdf In the presentation they list several ASN and Network blocks in use, but not registered in any database. Network Origin AS Description 135.0.0.0/13 10455 Lucent Technologies and with the help of Internap they have now fixed their announcement to comply with what appears in ARIN. If anyone can help out here - it would be appreciated. We have been sending emails to anyone and everyone in AS568 since January - all of them generating not a single reply.The US Department of Defense (AS 568) wins the prize for the most unregistered network blocks being announced. But they weren't alone. So if the US Military can hijack a few IPs, we will have a hard time convincing spammers and their shills to stop hijacking other available address space: Network Origin AS Description 132.0.0.0/10 568 DISO-UNRRA 137.0.0.0/13 568 DISO-UNRRA 158.0.0.0/13 568 DISO-UNRRA 192.153.136.0/21 568 DISO-UNRRA 192.172.0.0/19 568 DISO-UNRRA Obviously, there are some since we do see these announcements pop up here and there.If you are going to start blackholing unregistered network blocks, I suggest checking if the current user has nuclear weapons. But once again, which ISP's aren't filtering? -Hank
|