North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical RE: Get as much IP space as you ever dreamed of, was: Re: Looking to buy IPv4 addresses from class C swamp
On Tue, 29 Apr 2003, Daniel Golding wrote: > And in the event the owner can't be contacted? And if contact is Figure out a plan B.. > successful, and the owner says "I'm just holding on to it because I like Request they conform to the new administration > have 10 /24s" or, worse, he gets the clue and just starts advertising the > space, without using it? Then we have both address space waste and routing Again, work out a plan and request they conform.. These are actions you can develop plans for, and whatever happens you increase your knowledge and remove a little more of the unknown swamp.. Steve > table bloat... > > - dan > > On Mon, 28 Apr 2003, Stephen J. Wilcox wrote: > > > [Should non-routed addresses be revoked?] > > > > No, but they should be watched to see if they remain unrouted and then > > try to contact the owner.. > > > > On Mon, 28 Apr 2003, Temkin, David wrote: > > > > > And something else a lot of people tend to forget - just because space isn't > > > in the tables doesn't mean it's not in use. > > > > Something of a waste? > > > > > There are companies that connect to thousands of other companies (see the > > > financial markets) that require unique addressing between companies with > > > non-colliding address ranges. 10.x.x.x doesn't quite cut it. > > > > Why not? 16 million addresses arent enough? (and thats only 10/8) > > > > RFC1918 does suggest non-public intra-company networks use private space. > > > > Steve > > > > > > > > > > -DT > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Stephen Sprunk [mailto:[email protected]] > > > Sent: Monday, April 28, 2003 6:01 PM > > > To: Daniel Golding; Kai Schlichting > > > Cc: North American Noise and Off-topic Gripes > > > Subject: Re: Get as much IP space as you ever dreamed of, was: Re: Looking > > > to buy IPv4 addresses from class C swamp > > > > > > > > > > > > Thus spake "Daniel Golding" <[email protected]> > > > > ARIN needs to repo any space that has [not] been advertised for a > > > > reasonable length of time, and reissue it. > > > > > > So you're claiming that ARIN should revoke any allocations, including those > > > made before it came into existence, simply because the addresses aren't in > > > the global tables? > > > > > > If that's the position of the community, that's a drastic change from > > > assertions made in the IETF WGs and may affect address allocation guidelines > > > and even some protocol work. > > > > > > S > > > > > > Stephen Sprunk "God does not play dice." --Albert Einstein > > > CCIE #3723 "God is an inveterate gambler, and He throws the > > > K5SSS dice at every possible opportunity." --Stephen Hawking > > > > > > > > > IMPORTANT:The information contained in this email and/or its attachments is > > > confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the > > > sender immediately by reply and immediately delete this message and all its > > > attachments. Any review, use, reproduction, disclosure or dissemination of > > > this message or any attachment by an unintended recipient is strictly > > > prohibited. Neither this message nor any attachment is intended as or > > > should be construed as an offer, solicitation or recommendation to buy or > > > sell any security or other financial instrument. Neither the sender, his or > > > her employer nor any of their respective affiliates makes any warranties as > > > to the completeness or accuracy of any of the information contained herein > > > or that this message or any of its attachments is free of viruses. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
|