North American Network Operators Group
Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

Re: Question about 223/8

  • From: Jack Bates
  • Date: Tue Apr 29 03:57:22 2003 
Jared Mauch wrote:

	While the issue on the surface appears to be fairly pety, the
223/8 block was assigned to a RIR.  223.255.255/24 is reserved per rfc.

And this is why my question. RFC 3330 states that 223.255.255/24 can be assigned to a RIR. What gives one RFC weight over another? Is it an issue of RFC type or obsoletion status?

-Jack