North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: Re[2]: Low AS - Number
On Tue, 22 Apr 2003, Bruce Campbell wrote: > On Mon, 21 Apr 2003, Alex Lambert wrote in reply to Subhi S Hashwa: > > > > More money than sense IMHO > > > > Reminds me of the shell providers that burn a /24 just to give their kids > > more IRC vanity hosts. > > </hat=RIR> > <hat=security> > > From the avoiding denial-of-service-attacks-that-impact-your-network > point of view, putting your attractive-to-irritating-script-kiddies hosts > on a separate network is a good thing, as you can always drop the specific > network to save the performance of the rest of your network. Yes, assuming you have some sort of PI /24 .. (if its just split from an aggregate which is also routed as most seem to be you still get the traffic) > If you happen to have a spare ASN around to do so with, even better. ASN is irrelevant Steve > > </hat> > > --==-- > Bruce. > > I do not speak for my employer. > >
|