|
North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: Low AS - Number
On Mon, Apr 21, 2003 at 11:46:19AM -0400, Dwight Ringdahl wrote: > > Nope strictly for marketing reasons... ASN has almost no place in BGP > selection. > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Monday, April 21, 2003 11:39 AM > To: [email protected] > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Low AS - Number > > On Mon, 21 Apr 2003 11:10:58 EDT, Dwight Ringdahl <[email protected]> > said: > > Just a quick FYI, I am no longer with WebUseNet ASN 19151. I'll be > starting > > to build a new network over the next several months. Does anyone have a > low > > ASN I can buy/transfer as to not have one up in the 30,000s... > > Lemme guess - not only do some places filter 69/8, they bogon-filter AS http://puck.nether.net/~jared/papers/69-paper.html > numbers > over 32K as well? Or is there some other reason? I can't find it right now, but I believe there is a regex out there that some people may be using to drop unallocated asn blocks in as-path filtering. Considering the following, it's not too shocking to understand why people would want to drop such announcements: http://www.cymru.com/BGP/asnbogusrep.html > > > -- Jared Mauch | pgp key available via finger from [email protected] clue++; | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/ My statements are only mine.
|