|
North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: 69/8 revisited
I've definitely noticed the steady decline in complaints in reachability. I think though at some point it will be resolved, after all all the other blocks got squared away it seems, or is that an incorrect assumption? ----- Original Message ----- From: <[email protected]> To: "Rick Ernst" <[email protected]> Cc: <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2003 10:26 AM Subject: Re: 69/8 revisited > > On Wed, 19 Mar 2003, Rick Ernst wrote: > > > Their answer was basically that 69/8 (only) is where they are allocating from > > and that "from reading NANOG, it appears that much of the problem has been > > resolved." > > I wonder what they based that ASSumption on? > > The thread just sort of died...and now you've revived it. > > > I haven't seen any updated information that 69/8 is now working for people. > > Is everyone just quiet about it, or have filters actually been updated making > > this a non-issue? > > I've been busy with other things, so I haven't been able to spend as much > time on my 69/8 reachability project as I did the first few days. I still > have a list of about 700 destinations reachable from 209.208/17 but not > from 69/8. That's down from about 1000 when I did the first ping sweep. > I know I've personally gotten half a dozen or so networks to update their > filtering. I've also had several messages apparently go ignored (1 week > with no response and no filter update), two of which are US military > /16's. > > A bunch of the remaining affected networks are in other countries where > I'm afraid language is going to be a barrier. This issue will likely > never be entirely resolved. Just hope your customers don't care about > reaching the remaining affected networks. > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > Jon Lewis *[email protected]*| I route > System Administrator | therefore you are > Atlantic Net | > _________ http://www.lewis.org/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key_________ > >
|