North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: APNIC returning 223/8 to IANA
On Mon, Mar 17, 2003 at 01:11:06AM -0500, Andy Dills wrote: > > Anybody else think IANA should tell APNIC to take what was issued and > STFU? I mean, come on, you're want a different /8 because a single /24 at > the very end was reserved? And you're trying to convince us that the > intelligent people in the AP have no way of coming to grips with the > concept of "RESERVED"? > > Hell, just allocate that single /24 back to IANA and nobody has to deal > with the earth shattering difficulty of translating RESERVED. > > Somebody has to deal with the issue of breaking the pretty aggregation due > to the /24 at the end. Why does APNIC feel it shouldn't be them that must > deal with this small problem? That region of the net certainly causes its > share of problems. If APNIC doesn't want it, I'm sure I could find someone who does. :) Yes this is remarkably silly. What could possibly be broken by a reserved /24 out of a /8. -- Richard A Steenbergen <[email protected]> http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)
|