North American Network Operators Group

Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

RE: 69/8...this sucks

  • From: Andy Dills
  • Date: Tue Mar 11 13:16:14 2003

On Tue, 11 Mar 2003, Owen DeLong wrote:

>
> In short, it doesn't.  Longer answer, if the ISP configures his router
> correctly, he can actually refuse to accept advertisements from other
> sessions that are longer versions of prefixes received through this session.
>
> However, it's primarily intended to solve the non-malicious, but somewhat
> malignant problem of out-of-date bogon filters by people trying to do the
> right thing.

So why does it need to be done by somebody "official"? Why make
organizations who don't have route servers do this?

I've been peering with Rob's bogon server for a little while, and it works
great. All of my customers get routes that point the bogons to a traffic
sink on my network. If they were so inclined, they could sink that traffic
before leaving their network.

Andy

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Andy Dills                              301-682-9972
Xecunet, LLC                            www.xecu.net
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Dialup * Webhosting * E-Commerce * High-Speed Access