North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: 223.255.255.0/24
> > > > The outcome of the discussions at the Address Policy SIG will be posted > > to this list. > > where, one hopes, discussion will continue, yes? > > randy > why would an APNIC/AP region specific issue need to be discussed on the NANOG list and not the RIPE/AFNOG/et.al. regional ops lists? This is a prefix delegated to the APregion and so they should be the ones who set the policies for the prefixes they are responsible for. I appreciate their willingness to share the outcome of their deliberations, but why NAites have any special say in AP policies is a bit beyond me. --bill
|