|
North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: Level3 routing issues?
On Sat, 25 Jan 2003, K. Scott Bethke wrote: > > BIll, > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Bill Woodcock" <[email protected]> > > I'd agree with it. Except the herds of losers who still buy exploding > > crap from Vendor M don't seem to be thinning themselves out quickly > > dude, the Exploding Cars are so much easier to drive than the ones from > Vendor L. (tic) unfortunately (being a vendor L user myself) you must admit that these too have problems :( (at times) > > > enough. Maybe they're sexually attractive to each other, and reproduce > > before their stupidity kills them. That would be unfortunate. Or maybe > > it's just that none of this computer stuff actually matters, so exploding > > crap isn't actually fatal. Maybe that's it. > > I think it sucks that they are exploding on MY highway. > > With that in mind is it time yet to talk about solutions to problems like > this from the network point of view? Sure its easy to put up access list's > when needed but I have 100megs available to me on egress and I was trying to > push 450megs. Is there anything protocol, vendor specific or otherwise that > will not allow rogue machines to at will take up 100% of available > resources? I know extreme networks has the concept of Max Port utilization > on thier switches, will this help? Suggestions? > Keep in mind that these problems aren't from 'well behaved' hosts, and 'well behaved' hosts normally listen to ECN/tcp-window/Red/WRED.... classic DoS attack scenario. :(
|