|
North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: COM/NET informational message
At 18:31 +0000 1/3/03, E.B. Dreger wrote: UTF-8 is a standard. MS products have used two-octet chars to support Unicode for a long time. Any reason to add yet another encoding? Sounds like a question to ask of the IETF. The DNS protocol is not 8-bit safe, much less any implementations of it. This is because ASCII upper case characters are down cased in comparisons. I.e., the following are equivalent label values in DNS: ABCDEF and abcdef and AbCdEf. Each has distinct binary encodings, but DNS comparisons treat them as equal.How about encouraging widespread adoption of EXISTING standards instead of adding more cruft? UTF-8 is standard. Proper DNS implementations are eight-bit safe. People upgraded browsers due to SSL, Year 2000, Javascript... -- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Edward Lewis +1-703-227-9854 ARIN Research Engineer
|