|
North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical RE: FW: /8s and filtering
Yes, I just read that. But then APNIC's policy allows no such thing. http://www.apnic.net/docs/policy/add-manage-policy.html#10.1 Harsha. On Tue, 10 Dec 2002, Ejay Hire wrote: > "This policy allows a downstream customer's multi-homing requirement to > serve as justification for a /24 reassignment from their upstream ISP, > regardless of host requirements" > > -ej > > -----Original Message----- > From: Harsha Narayan [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2002 1:41 PM > To: Alec H. Peterson > Cc: Ejay Hire; [email protected] > Subject: RE: FW: /8s and filtering > > Hello, > The policy says that a /24 of PA space can be given if the > customer can show that it has an immediate requirement of 25% of the > /24 = /26. > > That is the reason I asked if the multihomer has to be able to fully > utilize a /26=25% of /24 to be able to multihome. > > Thanks, > Harsha. > > On Tue, 10 Dec 2002, Alec H. Peterson wrote: > > > > > --On Tuesday, December 10, 2002 13:08 -0600 Ejay Hire > <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Having a /24 doesn't indicate you are a network of any particular > size, > > > ARIN ratified a policy that allows multihoming as justification for > a > > > /24. > > > > I was thinking about PI space. ARIN did in fact ratify a policy > stating > > that a provider may allocate a customer a /24 of PA space if they are > > multihomed. > > > > Alec, red-faced AC member > > > > -- > > Alec H. Peterson -- [email protected] > > Chief Technology Officer > > Catbird Networks, http://www.catbird.com > > >
|