North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical
RE: Operational Issues with 126.96.36.199/8...
Sorry, which operational aliases did the RIRs announce before they started allocating addreses? On Fri, 6 Dec 2002, Barry Raveendran Greene wrote: > IMHO - The RIRs are doing their part. They announce to the operations > aliases their intention to allocate a new block before they start doing > it. People like me (with the ingress-prefix-template), Rob Thomas (with > the bogon template), and Steve Gill (with the Junos flavor of the > ingress-prefix-template) start tweaking our templates and post them to > the community. > > After that, it would be up to each operations team to execute within > their own network. > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of > Adam "Tauvix" Debus > Sent: Friday, December 06, 2002 12:16 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Operational Issues with 188.8.131.52/8... > > > > > > So for the sake of argument, in your proposal an ISP could filter all > of > > the blocks that the RIRs allocate out of and hamstring them > indefinitely? > > > > Perhaps not, but an X month period after the inital allocation to > the > RIR where they don't assign out of that pool might be wise. Perhaps > e-mails > can be sent to the registered contacts of existing IP space upon initial > allocation, on the first of each month, and then on the last day of the > hold. > > I know that I am sometimes a bit too busy to take care of something > like > that at the very instant I get the e-mail, and that it can fall to the > wayside. Many times a reminder e-mail has come at a moment where I was > able > do to something about it. > > Thanks, > > Adam "Tauvix" Debus > Linux Certified Professional, Linux Certified Administrator #447641 > Network Administrator, ReachONE Internet > [email protected] > > >